Are you considering purchasing a Rivian R1S electric SUV but can’t decide between the Performance Dual-Motor and Quad-Motor versions? The good news is that both models offer exceptional performance and technology that differentiates them from other electric SUVs. However, there are some critical differences between the two models that you should consider before making your decision.
This blog post will explore the differences between the Rivian R1S Performance Dual-Motor and Quad-Motor models. We’ll also examine the technology and features that make each model unique, helping you decide which model suits you. So, buckle up, and let’s dive into these two Rivian R1S electric SUV models!
Rivian R1S Performance Dual-Motor vs. Quad-Motor: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Dual-Motor | Quad-Motor | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 700 hp | 872 hp |
| Torque | 700 ft-lbs | 908 ft-lbs |
| Operational Range | Up to 390 miles | 321 miles |
| Torque Vectoring? | Yes, front and rear torque vectoring | Independent torque vectoring per wheel (4-wheel) |
| 0-60 mph Time | 3.5 seconds | 3 seconds |
| Towing Capacity | 7,700 lbs | 7,700 lbs |
| MSRP | $79,800 | $92,000 |
Rivian R1S Performance Dual-Motor vs. Quad-Motor: What’s the Difference?
Before we begin breaking down these vehicles’ key differences, let’s talk about the basics of each individual model.
The Performance Dual-Motor model boasts an impressive 0-60 mph acceleration time of just 3.5 seconds and a top speed of 130 mph. Its dual-motor system powers the front and rear wheels, providing exceptional traction and stability on any terrain. The Dual-Motor model offers a range of up to 300 miles on a single charge, making it a practical option for longer journeys.
On the other hand, the Quad-Motor model takes performance to the next level. This version of the R1S features four individual motors, one for each wheel, providing unparalleled traction and handling. With a 0-60 mph acceleration time of just 3 seconds and a top speed of 155 mph, the Quad-Motor model is the clear choice for thrill-seekers looking for the ultimate driving experience.
Here’s a complete, broken-down explanation of the differences between the Rivian R1S Performance Dual-Motor and the Quad-Motor.
Performance
The most noticeable difference between the two models is the horsepower and torque. The R1S Performance Dual-Motor has a total output of 700 horsepower and 700 ft-lbs of torque, while the R1S Performance Quad-Motor has 872 horsepower and 908 ft-lbs of torque.
This means the Quad-Motor can accelerate faster and handle stricter terrain than the Dual-Motor. The R1S Performance Quad-Motor can go from 0 to 60 mph in 3 seconds, compared to the Dual-Motor’s 3.5 seconds.
Operational Range
Despite having a more powerful motor, the R1S Performance Quad-Motor has a shorter operational range than the Dual-Motor. The Dual-Motor can travel up to 390 miles on a single charge, while the Quad-Motor can only travel up to 321. However, this difference in range may not be significant for many drivers as both models offer sufficient coverage for daily commutes and even some road trips.
Torque Vectoring
Another significant difference between the two models is torque vectoring. The R1S Performance Dual-Motor has front and rear torque vectoring, which means that the torque can be directed to the wheels that need it the most, providing better traction and stability. On the other hand, the R1S Performance Quad-Motor has independent torque vectoring per wheel (4-wheel), which provides even more precise control over the vehicle’s handling.
©James Yarbrough/Shutterstock.com
Towing Capacity
The R1S Performance Dual-Motor and Quad-Motor both have a towing capacity of 7,700 lbs, making them suitable for hauling heavy loads. This capacity is impressive for an electric vehicle and can make the R1S an excellent option for outdoor enthusiasts.
MSRP
The R1S Performance Dual-Motor has an MSRP of $79,800, while the R1S Performance Quad-Motor is priced at $92,000. The price difference is significant, and potential buyers should consider whether the extra horsepower, torque, and independent torque vectoring per wheel are worth the additional cost for them.
Rivian R1S Performance Dual-Motor vs. Quad-Motor: 5 Must-Know Facts
- The Performance Quad-Motor option has 172 more horsepower than the Dual-Motor, with 872 horsepower versus 700 horsepower.
- The Performance Quad-Motor also has higher torque with 908 ft-lbs, compared to the Dual-Motor’s 700 ft-lbs.
- The Dual-Motor has a slightly better operational range of up to 400 miles than the Performance Quad-Motor’s 328 miles.
- Both models have torque vectoring, but the Performance Quad-Motor has independent torque vectoring per wheel, making it more precise.
- The Performance Quad-Motor can go from 0-60 mph in an impressive 3 seconds, while the Dual-Motor takes 4.5 seconds.
Rivian R1S Performance Dual-Motor vs. Quad-Motor: Which One is Better for You?
When choosing between the Rivian R1S Performance Dual-Motor and Quad-Motor, there are several factors to consider. First and foremost, it’s essential to understand the differences between the two options. The Dual-Motor configuration includes one motor at the front and one at the back of the vehicle, while the Quad-Motor configuration has two engines at the front and rear.
In terms of performance, the Quad-Motor configuration offers more power and acceleration than the Performance Dual-Motor. Additionally, the Quad-Motor has better handling and off-road capabilities due to its ability to distribute torque to all four wheels. However, the Dual-Motor configuration may be more efficient and offer better range due to its lighter weight.
Ultimately, the decision between the two options comes down to budget, personal preference, and specific needs. If you prioritize off-road capabilities and raw power, the Quad-Motor may be better. On the other hand, if efficiency and range are more important to you, the Dual-Motor may be the way to go. Indeed, if you want a more affordable choice, the Performance Quad-Motor will be best for you.
The image featured at the top of this post is ©Mike Mareen/Shutterstock.com.
