
© ZikG / Shutterstock.com
NanoCell vs OLED: 4 Need to Know Facts
OLED
- OLED displays are self-illuminating which eliminates the need for LED backlighting.
- Highly rated by TV experts and photographers, OLED produces incredibly detailed images.
- OLED TVs are more expensive than LED TVs, and sometimes cost twice the price of LG’s NanoCell TVs.
- The NanoCell model out-performs the OLED in well-lit rooms.
If you’re in the market for a smart TV, you’re probably weighing NanoCell vs OLED options for your next upgrade. The truth is, NanoCell and OLED are two quality yet different TV models. How do the two compare, and which is better? Let’s see how both displays stack up against each other using side-by-side comparisons, must-know facts, and pros and cons.
OLED vs NanoCell: Side-by-Side Comparison
NanoCell | OLED | |
---|---|---|
Display Type | LED Backlight (OLED) | Self-Emitting Pixels (LED-LCD) |
Contrast | Low | Very High |
Color Accuracy | Excellent | Excellent |
Screen Thickness | 35.56 mm | 3.85 mm |
Viewing Angle | Wide (~30°) | Very Wide (~60°) |
Response Time | 10 ms (Low) | 1.7 ms (Very Low) |
NanoCell
- The technology uses particles to absorb unwanted light wavelengths.
- They have a higher power consumption than OLEDs.
- LG touts that its displays support over one billion colors, even though the human eye can only distinguish between 10 million colors.
NanoCell vs OLED: What’s the Difference?
OLED
OLED stands for Organic Light Emitting Diode. Its self-illuminating displays eliminate the need for LED backlighting. As a newer digital display technology, OLED doesn’t require a backlight to show images. Instead, each pixel is individually lit.
With OLED, it’s possible to achieve “true black,” where some TV parts can be completely dark. The logic behind this is simple. When the TV area is black, the pixels are turned off. OLED TVs are highly rated by TV experts and photographers alike for their contrast, deep blacks, and excellent dynamic range.
Despite their incredible image detail, OLED are more expensive than most LED TVs. Some models cost twice the price of LG Nanocel TVs. Not to mention, there is always the remote risk of a “burn-in”, when an image freezes on the screen.
- Contains about 8.3 million self-illuminating pixels that switch on and off
- AI-powered processor behind the intuitive Smart TV Hub
- Quantum HDR OLED 4K
- Built-in Dolby Atmos
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Remarkable color fidelity | Expensive than most LED TVs |
High efficiency and operational stability | Susceptible to water damage |
Incredible image detail | Remote risk of a burn-in |
Power-efficient |
NanoCell
LG NanoCell technology uses particles to absorb unwanted light wavelengths and enhance the purity of the red and green colors displayed on the screen.
In addition, they create subtler, more accurate colors that stay true, even at wide viewing angles. LG touts that NanoCell displays support over one billion colors. Never mind that the physical eye can only distinguish between 10 million colors.
Nanoparticles absorb the extra light at the unwanted wavelength and cut down on color bleed from RGB colors displayed on the screen. The displays can create more accurate colors with narrow bands using red, green, and blue.
NanoCell TVs are easy to identify as they all have ‘Nano’ in the model name.
- A7 GEN 4 AI Processor 4K upscales content to 4K
- NanoCell technology evenly disperses light sources across LED backlighting
- Features full array dimming
- Cinema HDR, Dolby Vision IQ, and Dolby Atmos support
- 120Hz refresh rate, ALLM, and HGiG to enhance gaming experiences
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Better image quality and dynamic range than LED | Lower color accuracy and image quality |
Wide viewing range | Less realistic image when a pixel bleeds off color |
Rarely fade like traditional LCD monitors | Their blacks are not as dark as NanoCell screens |
Not susceptible to the burn-in effect |
NanoCell vs OLED: Which One Is Better? Which One Should You Use?
From user reports, OLED displays are better because they can individually turn off pixels, have near-instant response times, wider viewing angles, and better color accuracy. NanoCell is best used in bright areas.
OLED performs at a high level and supports quality viewing but at a high price, while NanoCell is more affordably priced. So, if you have the budget, OLED is a good choice. Although many also say that NanoCell TVs come with excellent features that enhance an immersive gaming experience.
The bottom line is NanoCell vs OLED are two common monitor types, with their pros and cons. They’re inherently different, and each excels in a distinct set of scenarios. Ultimatel, the choice of NanoCell over OLED TVs comes down to use case and budget.
Up Next…
- The Top 5 Antivirus Programs: Which One is the Best? If you’re worried about cyberthreats, check out our guide to the best antivirus software to keep you safe while browsing the internet.
- What’s the Next Big Thing in Technology? It’s fun to dream about what the next great technological advancement will be. We’ve done some research to fill you in.
- A Guide To Today’s Top Dating Apps: Which Are Best? So you’re single and dreaming of finding “the one?” Check out our list of the best dating apps to help you find Mr. (or Ms.) Right!