Moto G Fast and Moto G Pure are two popular, affordable smartphones from Motorola. Both boast impressive features and specifications, making them attractive options for consumers seeking a reliable yet budget-friendly smartphone.
With so much similarity between the two devices, deciding which is better can take time. We’ll compare the Moto G Fast vs. Moto G Pure in an in-depth review, giving you all of the features and capabilities of each. So let’s look closely at each and see which best meets your needs.
Motorola Moto G Fast vs. Moto G Pure: Side-by-Side Comparison
|Specification||Moto G Fast||Moto G Pure|
|Processor||Qualcomm Snapdragon 665||MediaTek Helio G25|
|Display||6.4″||6.5” Max Vision|
|Resolution||HD+ (1560×720) | 268ppi||HD+ (1600×720) | 269ppi|
|Rear camera||16 MP main, 2 MP macro, 8 MP ultra-wide||13 MP main, 2 MP depth sensor|
|Front camera||8 MP||5 MP|
|Charging||10W charging||10W charging|
|Storage||32GB (expandable up to 512GB)||32GB (expandable up to 512GB)|
|Operating system (OS)||Android 10||Android 11|
Motorola Moto G Fast vs. Moto G Pure: What’s the Difference?
Moto G Fast and Moto G Pure differ in some ways, which can impact your user experience. Let’s explore their difference and see which phone best meets your requirements.
Moto G Fast is powered by Android 10 OS, giving you quick access to your favorite Google apps. It boasts a Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 Mobile Processor – an efficient midrange chip capable of handling most daily tasks efficiently.
With 3GB RAM, Moto G Fast should have more than enough memory for most users. A rear fingerprint reader exists for added security, and its 32GB built-in internal storage can be expanded up to 512GB using a microSD card.
On the other hand, the Moto G Pure runs Android 11 and features a MediaTek Helio G25 processor – a mid-range option – with 3GB RAM and 32GB internal storage that can be expanded up to 512GB using a microSD card. Furthermore, it features a fingerprint reader and face unlock for added security.
Performance-wise, both phones can handle most everyday tasks with ease. However, the Moto G Fast boasts a slightly faster processor, which may translate to faster responsiveness. It comes with a sophisticated sensor set, including an accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity, ambient light, and sensor hub – all of which offer users an enhanced user experience.
If you prioritize a more advanced sensor setup and faster processor, Moto G Fast may be your best bet. On the other hand, if you value having an advanced Android OS version and face unlock security feature, Moto G Pure is a good pick.
A smartphone’s display matters when shopping for a new phone. The Moto G Fast boasts a 6.4-inch display with an HD+ resolution of 1560×720 pixels and 268ppi pixel density. Its screen-to-body ratio of 88% means the display takes up most of the phone’s front surface area. The device has an IPS panel for optimal viewing angles, color accuracy, and a Max Vision display. With it, you’ll enjoy a broader, more immersive viewing experience.
Moto G Pure boasts a larger 6.5-inch Max Vision display with an HD+ resolution of 1600×720 pixels and 269ppi pixel density. However, its screen-to-body ratio is slightly lower at 81% – meaning there’s more bezel around the display. It uses an IPS TFT LCD panel similar to the Moto G Fast but with fewer viewing angles and lesser color accuracy. Plus, its aspect ratio of 20:9 provides a taller and slimmer screen overall.
Overall, both phones have similar displays with HD+ resolution. However, the Moto G Fast has a slightly higher screen-to-body ratio which may provide a more immersive viewing experience. Its standard IPS panel may offer better viewing angles and color accuracy than the IPS TFT LCD panel on the Moto G Pure.
The camera performance of the Moto G Fast and Moto G Pure differ significantly, with the former boasting a 16MP rear lens, 2MP macro lens, and 8MP ultra-wide lens.
The rear camera of the Moto G Fast can record UHD (30fps) or FHD (60/30fps) videos, while its front camera captures both FHD (30fps) and HD (30fps) videos. Shot optimization, auto smile capture, gesture selfie, smart composition, and HDR allow you to take better snapshots fast.
Conversely, the Moto G Pure only features a 13MP primary lens and 2MP depth sensor. As a result, it may not perform well in low light conditions compared to its advanced counterpart. Both rear cameras can capture Full HD (30fps) videos while front cameras record at 30fps. The two models pack sports software features like portrait mode beauty, auto smile capture, gesture capture, and HDR.
If you need a phone with a more advanced camera system, the Moto G Fast may be your best bet. On the other hand, if performance isn’t your top priority, then the Moto G Pure still offers an adequate camera system for everyday use.
Motorola Moto G Fast vs. Moto G Pure: 7 Must-Know Facts
- Moto G Fast has a 6.4″ display, while the Moto G Pure has a slightly larger 6.5″ display.
- Both devices have an HD+ resolution, with the Moto G Pure at 1600×720 and Moto G Fast at 1560×720 resolution.
- Moto G Fast has a higher screen-to-body ratio of 88%, while Moto G Pure has a screen-to-body ratio of 81%.
- Both devices offer expandable storage of up to 512GB with a microSD card.
- Moto G Fast has an IPS display, while the Moto G Pure has an IPS TFT LCD.
- Both devices have a 4000mAh battery, offering up to two days of battery life.
- Moto G Fast has a triple camera setup (16MP rear camera, 2MP macro lens, 8MP ultra-wide lens), while the Moto G Pure has a dual camera setup (13MP rear camera and 2MP depth sensor).
Motorola Moto G Fast vs. Moto G Pure: Which One Is Better?
Motorola’s Moto G series is one of the most sought-after smartphone lineups in recent years, and their two latest releases – Moto G Fast and Moto G Pure are growing popular. Moto G Fast offers better performance with its Snapdragon 665 processor and superior rear camera and is a good pick for those who prioritize these features. On the other hand, Moto G Pure is more budget-friendly, with a slightly larger display. It is a good option for those who want a bigger screen without investing a lot.
Ultimately, your decision will depend on your priorities and budget. Go for the Moto G Fast if you have the cash and are looking for better performance and enhanced camera capabilities. However, if money is an issue, but you still want a larger screen, opt for the Moto G Pure instead.
The image featured at the top of this post is ©Framesira/Shutterstock.com.