- The Mazda MX-30 has a range of around 100 miles per charge, making it suitable for daily commuting and short trips in urban environments.
- The Volvo XC40 has a larger battery and can provide approximately 223 miles per charge, allowing for longer journeys and reducing the need for frequent charging.
- The Mazda MX-30 starts at $34,110, making it a more budget-friendly option, while the Volvo XC40 starts at $53,550, offering a longer range and superior features.
- Both the Mazda MX-30 and the Volvo XC40 have received 5-star safety ratings and offer various safety features, although the Volvo XC40 has additional features like a 360-degree camera system for easier parking.
- Both the Mazda MX-30 and the Volvo XC40 are eligible for the Federal EV Tax Credit, which can help offset the price of the vehicles.
The EV (electric vehicle) market is rapidly evolving. Therefore, manufacturers are continuously delivering innovative technologies and refined designs. Two such cars making waves on the market are the Mazda MX-30 and the Volvo XC40. In this article, we’ll explore the similarities and differences between the two electric vehicles. We’ll cover key aspects of the vehicles such as their range, price, performance, drivetrain configurations, safety, and tax credit eligibility.
Mazda MX-30 vs. Volvo XC40: Side-by-Side Comparison
|Mazda MX-30||Volvo XC40|
|Drivetrain||FWD (Front-Wheel Drive)||AWD (All-Wheel Drive)|
|Power||143 hp||402 hp|
|Range||100 miles per charge||223 miles per charge|
|Price||starting at $34,110||starting at $53,550|
|Five-Star Safety Rating from Euro NCAP||Yes||Yes|
|Eligible for Federal EV Tax Credit||Yes||Yes|
|DC Fast charge time||36 minutes (20% to 80%)||37 minutes (10% to 80%)|
Mazda MX-30 vs. Volvo XC40: What’s the Difference?
A key difference between the Mazda MX-30 and the Volvo XC40 is their respective ranges. This has a significant impact on their suitability for different lifestyle needs. The MX-30 has a smaller battery pack that provides an estimated range of around 100 miles on a full charge. This is typically less than other EVs on the market, but, it would suffice for daily commuting, running errands, and short trips, especially in urban environments. However, it is not so suitable for long-distance traveling or for drivers who don’t have regular access to a charging station.
In contrast, the Volvo XC40 has a larger battery capable of providing approximately 223 miles per charge. This significantly greater range allows drivers peace of mind on longer journeys. It also reduces the need for frequent charging and the ability to venture further from home or charging stations.
Read our full review of the Mazda MX-30 here!
In terms of price, we see a stark difference between the two cars. The Mazda MX-30 is a far more budget-friendly option, with a starting price of $34,110. For those looking to enter the EV market without a significant investment, Mazda’s renowned design and build quality at a low cost make a lot of sense. However, it’s important to be aware of the frequent charging costs accumulated with the shorter range.
Then comes the premium option of the Volvo XC40, with prices starting at $53,550. While the initial investment here is a lot larger, you’re paying for the wonderful perks of having a longer range, among other superior features. Whether it’s the drivetrain or the potential for advanced safety and luxury features, you’re likely to get more for your money. Thus, depending on your requirements, the XC40 could be seen as a value-for-money offering.
If price is your greatest concern, check out the five cheapest electric cars in our guide!
Both the Mazda MX-30 and the Volvo XC40 are vehicles that ensure safety. They have both received 5-star ratings from Euro NCAP as some of the safest cars on the road. This is thanks to their many safety features, such as automatic braking, lane-keeping assistance, and advanced airbag systems.
However, it’s important to note that the exact safety features between the two vehicles will vary. Therefore, it’s crucial that buyers thoroughly research the two cars to discover which safety attributes satisfy their requirements best. For example, the Volvo XC40 has four cameras to provide a 360-degree view of the car to help drivers park with ease. Something the Mazda MX-30 unfortunately lacks.
Tax Credit Eligibility
Purchasing either of these vehicles comes with great incentives, as they’re both eligible for the Federal EV Tax Credit. This can certainly help you offset the price of the Mazda MX-30 or Volvo XC40, ultimately enhancing their affordability. The exact amount of credit provided will vary based on a number of factors. This can include the battery capacity of the vehicle and the buyer’s tax situation. We recommend consulting a tax professional to better understand the potential tax benefits for either of these cars.
The drivetrains of the two vehicles are another difference. The Mazda MX-30 utilizes a front-wheel-drive (FWD) system. These setups are typically lighter and less complex, which allows for reduced maintenance costs and the potential for greater energy efficiency. The FWD setup is suitable for most driving conditions, especially in urban and suburban environments. However, it does lack the performance of an all-wheel drive (AWD) system on challenging road conditions.
This is where the Volvo XC40 comes in equipped with its AWD system. This setup will provide far better traction in difficult driving conditions. Whether that is snow, rain, or off-roading, the vehicle will have better handling and overall stability. For drivers who often face these challenging conditions, or simply want better performance, the AWD setup is a far suitable choice.
Performance is a crucial factor when considering a new car. In terms of the Mazda MX-30 and the Volvo XC40, their horsepower varies significantly, which could be a deciding factor. The Mazda MX-30 is equipped with an electric motor capable of generating 143 horsepower. This is not impressive, especially compared to other EVs on the market. However, it’s definitely enough power to overtake cars on the highway and zip around the inner city.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 boasts a significantly powerful electric motor capable of producing 402 horsepower. This provides a noticeably greater advantage in acceleration and high-speed performance over the Mazda MX-30. This makes the VC40 a great choice for those who desire a more spirited drive, or often drive on highways and can benefit from the rapid acceleration.
In terms of charging, both the Mazda MX-30 and the Volvo XC40 support DC fast charging. This allows users to replenish a significant portion of the battery in a fairly short period of time. This is particularly handy for long road trips. The Mazda MX-30 offers a DC fast charge that takes the battery from 20% to 80% in around 36 minutes. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 can take its battery from 10% charge to 80% in 37 minutes with DC fast charging. These similar charge times allow for less downtime and more time on the road heading to your destination.
Looking for more comparisons of the Volvo XC40? Visit our guides:
- Volvo C40 vs. Volvo XC40
- Tesla Y Model vs. Volvo XC40
- Tesla Model 3 vs. Volvo XC40
- Polestar 4 vs. Volvo XC40
Mazda MX-30 vs. Volvo XC40: 5 Must-Know Facts
- The Mazda MX-30 has a smaller battery pack than the Volvo XC40, which leads to its shorter range.
- The Volvo XC40 provides an all-wheel-drive system. This offers potentially better performance in certain driving conditions compared to the Mazda’s front-wheel-drive system.
- Both vehicles boast a five-star safety rating from Euro NCAP, offering a high level of safety to their occupants.
- Both the Mazda MX-30 and the Volvo XC40 are eligible for the Federal EV Tax Credit. This can significantly offset their initial purchase prices.
- Despite the price difference, both vehicles offer premium interiors and a host of tech features.
Mazda MX-30 vs. Volvo XC40: Which One Is Better? Which One Should You Use?
When considering the above factors of safety, performance, and drivetrains, both models have their own unique advantages. The Volvo XC40 stands out with its superior safety features and its high-performance electric motor. These aspects typically make it attractive for buyers who’re looking to place an emphasis on performance and features for value.
In contrast, the Mazda MX-30 compensates for its solid performance in its class. Along with being the far more affordable option, making it more accessible to the masses and certainly an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers. Both vehicles qualify for the federal tax credit, which further sweetens the deal.
In terms of drivetrain, the Volvo XC40’s all-wheel-drive system provides better handling in a variety of weather conditions and terrains. Therefore, if you’re facing challenging conditions or have a more adventurous driving style, this car is certainly for you. On the other hand, the Mazda MX-30’s front-wheel-drive system will suffice for those simply commuting around urban and suburban settings.
In terms of performance, the Volvo XC40 boasts over 2.5 times the amount of horsepower the Mazda MX30 provides. This makes it clear for those who require more robust acceleration and speed. However, if you’re simply jotting around the city, the MX30 provides enough power for your needs. Especially when you compare the prices.
Ultimately, the decision on which one you should use rests on your personal lifestyle and driving needs. Do you require the high performance and versatility of an all-wheel-drive system, or would the efficiency and affordability of a front-wheel-drive vehicle suffice to get around? By weighing these factors, prospective buyers can make an informed decision that best aligns with their personal requirements.
The image featured at the top of this post is ©Daniliuc Victor/Shutterstock.com.