- Robotic mowers have the benefit of mowing your lawn consistently and keeping a consistent level lawn.
- The Husqvarna Automower 415X and Worx’s Landroid M 20V are both premium robotic mowers with good area coverage.
- The Landroid M 20V has a higher capacity battery and covers a quarter acre in three hours, while the Automower 415X takes four to five hours.
- Both mowers have solid performance and cutting systems, but the Landroid M 20V has a uniform cutting surface with its floating cutting disc.
- Both mowers are well-constructed and should last for years, but the Landroid M 20V has a slight edge in modularity with shared battery packs.
- Both mowers have similar setups, but the Automower 415X requires a special PIN while the Landroid M 20V requires a smartphone and scanning a QR code.
- The Automower 415X is a great choice for its build quality, while the Worx Landroid M 20V is a more affordable option.
Which mower wins between the Husqvarna Robotic vs. Worx Robotic Mower? Let’s face it, given the brutal heat of these summer months, mowing the lawn can be a challenge. Users looking to beat the heat might be considering a robotic mower of some sort.
Robotic mowers have the benefit of mowing your lawn consistently. If you leave to go out of town for a trip, provided you’ve set the routines properly it will keep mowing. Robotic mowers are also a great way of keeping a consistent level lawn, as it mows multiple times per week.
Depending on your needs, the Husqvarna Automower 415X may fit the bill quite adequately. Worx’s Landroid M 20V has also proven to be a popular robotic mower for these purposes. So, what better way to see which excels than a shootout?
Husqvarna Robotic Mower vs. Worx Robotic Mower: Side-by-Side Comparison
|Husqvarna Automower 415X||Worx Landroid M 20V|
|Battery Capacity||2 Ah||4 Ah|
|Charging Time||60 minutes||60 minutes|
|Cutting System||3 pivoting razor blades||7” offset 3-blade cutting disc|
|Area Covered||1/4 acre||1/4 acre|
|Weight||21.4 pounds||21.2 pounds|
|Length||24 inches||21.97 inches|
|Width||17.7 inches||15.91 inches|
|Height||9.4 inches||8.07 inches|
|Cutting Width||8.7 inches||7 inches|
There are some subtle differences between the two. A notable area to keep an eye on is the overall battery capacity.
Husqvarna Robotic Mower vs. Worx Robotic Mower: What’s the Difference?
Both the Automower 415X and Landroid M 20V are premium robotic mowers. This means you get quite a bit of area coverage on a single charge. However, both of these mowers require some setup to get running, rather than just being plug-and-play like a simple push or riding mower.
Total Area Coverage
The Automower 415X covers up to a quarter acre when the guide wires are properly set. This is quite substantial, accounting for most suburban lawns you’ll find in the United States.
Now, over an hour, the Automower 415X isn’t going to get the whole quarter acre of coverage. However, it’ll cover around 678 square feet per hour.
The Landroid M 20V is a stellar performer, as well, covering up to a quarter acre. It has a higher-capacity battery, meaning it runs for a longer time on a single charge. On a full quarter acre, the Landroid M 20V takes around three hours to cut the entire lawn.
You’ll be looking at around four to five hours for mowing an entire quarter acre with the Automower 415X. Now, this will greatly vary with conditions like weather, grass composition, and how thick the grass has grown.
That said, both are fairly stellar examples of automated mowers. If you don’t mind the extra time taken by the Automower 415X, it’ll do just fine. The Landroid M 20V gets the edge in terms of overall area coverage.
Performance ties into area coverage somewhat, but both of these mowers are pretty solid. The Automower 415X has a lesser battery capacity but a wider cutting width. It isn’t a substantial difference, being just under nine inches.
The Landroid M 20V does have a slightly smaller cutting width. However, the mechanism utilized by both of these mowers couldn’t be more different. Worx has implemented a floating cutting disc, meaning you’ve got a uniform cutting surface.
Husqvarna has stuck with its triple-blade system, which works quite well for most purposes. Both of these cutting systems are fairly easy to maintain. When the Automower 415X’s blades start to dull, you can readily flip them over to get a whole new cutting surface.
The same applies to the Landroid M 20V, the cutting disc is easily replaced. Both are made of decent-quality steel, so they should maintain decent cutting edges for quite a few hours. However, if you have a rocky lawn or one filled with obstructions you could see the blades not perform to their highest standard.
As discussed in the area coverage section, the Landroid M 20V can cover more area on a single charge. It has nearly double the battery capacity, meaning mowing takes considerably less time when applied over a quarter acre.
The Automower 415X can get a little lower in terms of cut consistency but does need to return to its charging dock more often.
In terms of overall longevity, both units appear to be well-constructed and should last for a number of years. Worx does get a slight edge in terms of modularity, as the battery packs are shared with their line of power tools.
Husqvarna has a reputation for quality, and the premium Automower 415X is no exception to this rule. Critics and users alike have found it to be rock solid provided you aren’t doing things like mowing frozen or wet grass.
Ease of Setup
Both the Automower 415X and Landroid M 20V feature very similar setups. Some users have noted they were able to get the Automower 415X up in a matter of minutes. The installation consists of laying down guide wire for the boundary of your lawn, then assembling the charging dock.
The Automower 415X does require you to input a special PIN that is unique to every mower. However, you can readily find this in the box when unpackaging the mower.
Worx’s Landroid M 20V requires a smartphone to complete installation. You’ll have to lay down the same sort of guide wire as well as assemble the charging station. However, when it comes time to actually activate the mower, you’ll need to scan a QR code.
Both are roughly equal when it comes to ease of setup, just make sure you block out some time for driving in the guide wires.
Husqvarna Robotic Mower vs. Worx Robotic Mower: 6 Must-Know Facts
- The Automower 415X can have its schedule set via a smartphone app.
- The Automower 415X has a wider cutting area.
- The Automower 415X is the more expensive option.
- The Landroid M 20V has better overall battery capacity and uses standard Worx batteries.
- The Landroid M 20V can only be controlled via a smartphone app.
- Worx’s Landroid M 20V has a smaller overall cutting area.
Husqvarna Robotic Mower vs. Worx Robotic Mower: Which One Is Better? Which One Should You Choose?
So, which is the better option between these two robotic mowers? Honestly, if price isn’t a concern the Automower 415X is a great choice. You get Husqvarna’s stellar build quality coupled with a powerful and dependable robotic mower.
However, if you’d like to spend a little less, the Worx Landroid M 20V is more than up to the task. It can be a bit tough to discern which of these is more suitable for the task. Worx doesn’t really allow you to make adjustments to the program of your robotic mower, which is a shame.
Most users will be relying on their smartphones to handle the day-to-day scheduling of a robotic mower. That said, the Husqvarna is a more flexible choice despite being a more expensive robotic mower.
Recent Technology Updates for the Husqvarna Robotic Mower and the Worx Robotic Mower
In recent months, Husqvarna and Worx Robotic Mowers have introduced technological advances, including:
- Improved navigation: Both manufacturers have introduced new robotic mowers that can create a virtual map of your lawn using GPS. This technology allows robotic mowers to navigate even complex gardens accurately and efficiently.
- More intelligent obstacle avoidance: More advanced sensors avoid obstacles such as trees and flower beds.
- Longer battery life: The latest models from both manufacturers can mow for up to four hours on a single charge.
- More user-friendly controls: Setting up and using these mowers is easier than ever thanks to more user-friendly controls.
Possible Future Technology Advances for Husqvarna Robotic Mower and Worx Robotic Mowers
While planned technology advances haven’t been announced for these robotic mowers, it’s likely that you will see some or all of the following in the next six to 18 months:
- Improved artificial intelligence (AI): While AI is already being used in robotic mowers, in the near future AI will undoubtedly improve existing features, such as obstacle avoidance, and add new ones that will improve these machines’ productivity and efficiency.
- Connectivity: Many robotic mowers are already equipped with Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connectivity, which allow users to control their mowers via smartphone or tablet. Future connectivity features may include the ability to schedule mowing jobs, control mowers remotely, or adjust scheduling based on weather conditions.
- Self-charging: Some robotic mowers can self-charge already, but this technology is still new. In the future, self-charging is likely to become more commonplace and more efficient.
- More affordable: Because robotic mowers are relatively new, most are quite expensive. In the near future, prices are likely to drop, making them more accessible for the general public.
The image featured at the top of this post is ©Alex_Traksel/Shutterstock.com.