What is Forefront AI? News cycles have been inundated with talk of AI chatbots and assistants. While news has typically centered around the likes of Google Bard and ChatGPT, Forefront is a new name. Essentially, it leverages some familiar technologies to create an online assistant.
AI doesn’t look to be going anywhere, so the advent of new utilities with extended functionality was an inevitability. Forefront AI does some things differently than its forebears, and perhaps best represents the modern wave of chatbots and assistants.
This guide will serve as an introduction to the utility, as well as a direct comparison to ChatGPT.
Forefront AI vs. ChatGPT: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Forefront AI | ChatGPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Engines Available | GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude, Claude 2 | GPT-3.5, GPT-4 |
| Use Case | AI assistant and business aid | Assistance and reference material |
| Image and Document Uploading Supported | Yes | Yes, but only for GPT-4 use |
| Age of Training Data | Current | GPT-4 training data stops at 2021 |
| Pricing | Free plan for basic AI access, then $9, $29, and $69 for increased access to better AI resources | $0.03 per token or $20 a month |
| Personas | Yes | No |
| Image Generation | Yes | No |
| Multi-User Instances | Yes | No |
Forefront AI vs. ChatGPT: What’s the Difference?
You might be inclined to think of Forefront as an extended ChatGPT, which is a fair assumption to make. However, while Forefront does leverage similar technologies, it goes much further with what it can do for the average user.
Engines Available
©Ascannio/Shutterstock.com
ChatGPT has only the basic GPT-3.5 and more advanced GPT-4 available. These are perfectly functional engines and will handle most AI workloads. GPT-3.5 is more limited and less refined, serving more as a taster for the premium GPT-4 model.
That said, you can certainly accomplish a fair bit with both. One thing to keep in mind is that the databases used to train both models are dated, meaning you’re operating with incomplete facts and more than two years of additional reference material missing.
Forefront AI leverages GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude, and Claude 2. GPT-3.5 and 4 function in much the same fashion as their implementation through OpenAI’s own interface. Claude and Claude+ are more interesting, being purpose-built AI assistants.
Claude is from the AI firm Anthropic and specializes in being more geared toward friendly and natural assistance. The assistant excels at analyzing transcripts, summarizing web pages, and text generation. Antropic’s model is also able to process more characters natively, which can be a benefit.
Pricing
ChatGPT’s pricing is fairly straightforward. Anyone can access the basic GPT-3.5 — all you need is an account. As this is a less accurate and cruder implementation of the technology, it serves more as a taster for users evaluating the service.
GPT-4 has a fairly affordable pricing structure. You can pay $0.02 per token for prompts or $20 a month for unlimited access to the model. Pricing doesn’t scale with enterprise use or multiple users.
Forefront AI has more flexible pricing but has more limited access overall. The basic free tier allows access to GPT-3.5 and Claude. You get 100 messages every three hours, which should be more than enough for most casual users.
Basic pricing starts at $9 and allows access to ten GPT-4 messages every three hours. The same extends to Claude 2 messages; you’ll get ten of those every three hours. Pro starts at $29 and allows triple the amount of GPT-4 and Claude 2 messages, coming in at 30 every three hours.
The highest pricing plan is Ultra, which costs $69 a month. This allows for 70 GPT-4 and Claude 2 messages every three hours, as well as greatly extended access to content length and internet searches.
Accuracy of Results
©Tapati Rinchumrus/Shutterstock.com
The accuracy of your results from a given prompt has been one of the more contentious concerns with these AI tools. The news has been littered with folks relying on ChatGPT in a professional capacity and then receiving incorrect output.
ChatGPT can be generally seen as accurate for more general knowledge. You should avoid using it if you need to cite specific information, as that is where things can quickly go wrong. For the likes of generating text or analyzing documents, it works well.
Forefront AI is generally more accurate on the whole, but that’s thanks in part to how it is implemented. While it still uses the GPT and Claude APIs to process input, it also can use internet searches as reference material. This leads to more accurate results, which might be more beneficial for users looking to generate factually correct data with Forefront.
Internet Access
When going through the ChatGPT website, you don’t have access to the wider internet. Instead, the AI model references its massive database of training points and information to display results. While this can be mostly accurate, it is still able to deliver malicious or factually incorrect output with alarming regularity.
Forefront AI doesn’t have this issue, and you can even use the quartet of AI engines to search and reference web material. This is restricted for free users, only allowing five web searches every three hours. However, the service itself does center around being a more complete assistant for users.
As such, the extensibility of these models to internet access makes quite a bit of sense. A real assistant would be able to reference material when asked or would search it out on their own.
Forefront AI vs. ChatGPT: 6 Must-Know Facts
- ChatGPT is arguably the most famous of the AI tools on the market currently.
- ChatGPT is great for general usage but falters with more specialized knowledge.
- ChatGPT has no means of accessing the internet on the OpenAI site.
- Forefront AI has four AI models you can leverage.
- Forefront AI has personas, which serve as AI assistants with defined personalities and skill sets.
- Forefront AI restricts basic access but also allows for internet searches.
Forefront AI vs. ChatGPT: Which One Is Better? Which Should You Choose?
When comparing these two AI services, there is one clear winner. While ChatGPT might have the edge when it comes to branding and affordability, it is still lacking in many areas. Despite the strides OpenAI has taken in refining its models, ChatGPT still has to work with offline data.
Forefront AI is a winner for giving free access to AI resources, while still maintaining affordable price structuring. When you factor in the fact that whole teams can use Forefront as a single session, it is easy to see which of these services might gain better traction in the months to come.
The image featured at the top of this post is ©cono0430/Shutterstock.com.
