- Ring and Arlo are two brands of video doorbells that offer users easy and flexible home security options.
- Both devices have similar camera resolutions and store your camera footage on the cloud for a small monthly fee.
- Arlo is the more affordable option of the two, but it lacks many of Ring’s more advanced features.
When it comes to smart home security systems, two of the biggest names in the game are Arlo and Ring. Both companies offer a range of products that allow you to monitor your home remotely via your smartphone or computer. Arlo is known for its sleek, wireless cameras that are easy to install and offer high-quality video footage. Ring, on the other hand, offers a wider variety of products, including doorbells, floodlights, and security cameras. Both Arlo and Ring offer cloud-based storage optionsWhile both systems have their pros and cons, ultimately the choice between Arlo and Ring will depend on your personal preferences, budget, and specific security needs.
Arlo vs. Ring
These days, getting a trustworthy home security system is much more affordable and convenient than it ever has been. Long gone are the ways where you need to get your whole house wired with an intricate alarm and security system thanks to products like Arlo and Ring, two do-it-yourself home security devices that let users bring some peace of mind to their residence simply by plugging the camera in and downloading an app. But which of these two security camera options is best? How do they compare to one another, and what are the key similarities and differences between the two? Let’s look at a comparison and weigh the pros and cons of each below.
Arlo vs. Ring: Side-by-Side Comparison
|Ring Doorbell Camera
|Arlo Video Doorbell
|Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2
|1536 x 1536p
|1536 x 1536p
|Field of view:
|Wireless version only
|$2.99/month cloud storage
|$3/month cloud storage
|$149 wired/$199 wireless
- Ring Video Doorbell – 1080p HD video, improved motion detection, easy installation – Venetian Bronze$99.99Buy on Amazon
- 1080p HD video doorbell with enhanced features that let you see, hear, and speak to anyone from your phone, tablet, or PC.
- An update from the original Ring Video Doorbell, enjoy improved motion detection, privacy zones and audio privacy, and crisper night vision.
- Receive mobile notifications when anyone presses your doorbell or triggers your built-in motion sensors.
- Powered by the built-in rechargeable battery or connects to existing doorbell wires for constant power.
- Easily setup by connecting your Ring Video Doorbell to wifi through the Ring app and mounting with the included tools.
We earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no additional cost to you.01/16/2024 09:18 pm GMT
- $69.99Buy on Amazon
- Easy to recharge
- Fast, wire-free setup (no wiring required), delivers increased installation flexibility to get the perfect view
- See a person from head to toe or a package on the ground with a 180-degree wide field view
- Detailed video in HD with HDR
- With Arlo Foresight, the security camera captures video prior to every motion-triggered video recording so you don't miss out
- Night vision
- Two-way audio
- Direct to Wi-Fi no hub needed
- Wire-free or wired
We earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no additional cost to you.01/16/2024 09:22 pm GMT
Arlo vs. Ring: What’s the Difference?
Now that you’ve seen how the Arlo and the Ring doorbell cameras stack up against one another, let’s take a closer look at the similarities and differences between the two security camera system options.
Perhaps the most important security camera component is the quality and specs of its video. After all, without good and reliable video, what’s the point of a camera system in the first place? On the surface, both the Arlo doorbell camera system and the Ring doorbell camera system have the same video resolution and the same aspect ratio. In this regard, they’re identical offerings.
However, the key distinction between the two is the field of view: Arlo’s camera has a 180-degree view, while the Ring only has a 150-degree view. This doesn’t make much of a difference when looking straight ahead but it does make quite a bit of a difference when looking at the peripheral of the video. While the video resolution remains identical, Arlo’s peripheral vision is much wider than Ring’s. This means that you can capture more of your surroundings with fewer cameras, which is great for large areas, like backyards or driveways.
Another important thing to consider when weighing the pros and cons is storage. What are the similarities and differences between Arlo’s storage plan and Ring’s storage plan? Similar to the video resolution debate, both Arlo and Ring rely on cloud storage to store your camera’s recordings. Additionally, both require users to pay a monthly fee in order to access said storage. For Arlo, it’s $2.99 a month. For Ring, it’s $3 a month. The difference between a penny is trivial. While yes, Arlo is technically cheaper, what kind of impact does a single cent really have? For all intents and purposes, the price is the same.
What about maximum storage, though? How long does each camera keep your video? For Ring, it’s 30 days in the EU and 60 days in the US. For Arlo, it’s 30 days. This puts Ring at an advantage for US customers.
Last but not least, the battery plays an important role in weighing the pros and cons of these two camera systems. After all, the last thing you’d want is for your camera’s battery to die right before you need it. Arlo gives users the option to purchase a wired version of the doorbell camera that plugs into a power source or a wireless version that relies on a battery. The wireless version has a battery life of six months on average.
While Ring has a wireless option in its base models, it offers no wireless version of its Pro models and only relies on a wired camera. On the plus side, a wired camera will never cut out on you because of a dead battery. On the downside, a power outage would render a wired camera useless while a wireless one would continue to work as usual.
Click here to check out Arlo Essential Wire-Free Video Doorbell on amazon.com.
Arlo vs. Ring: Three Must-Know Facts
- Both Arlo and Ring have a wide range of products at your disposal that goes far beyond simple doorbell cameras. Both security camera companies have several different options for you to explore, from mounted stick cameras to indoor cameras to spotlight cameras and everything in between. If a doorbell camera isn’t for you, consider one of these alternative models.
- Ring is compatible with Alexa, while Arlo is compatible with Alexa, Google Assistant, and even Apple HomeKit. This might make the difference in which doorbell camera you ultimately choose.
- Arlo and Ring both offer add-on chimes for their doorbell cameras. Arlo’s retails for $50, while Ring’s retails for $30.
Arlo vs. Ring: Which One Is Better? Which One Should You Use?
On the surface, the Arlo doorbell camera and the Ring doorbell camera look and perform incredibly similarly. Both have the same video resolution, both have the same aspect ratio, and both come with a similarly priced cloud storage platform… For this reason, to determine which is truly the best option for you to use, we have to look a little deeper.
The Arlo boasts a wider field of view — 180 degrees — and a cheaper overall price point: $149 for the wired version and $199 for the wireless. While the Ring has a smaller field of vision of just 150 degrees and a much higher price point of $249, it shouldn’t be dismissed based on these grounds alone.
At the end of the day, the Ring comes equipped with several other features not yet mentioned that make its higher price more valuable in the long run. 3D Motion is one example. Using radar, Ring can identify the distance of a moving object in relation to your door, then limits your notifications until the object is within a certain range of your home. This is incredibly handy when compared to the Arlo, which might send many more notifications without something like 3D Motion. While Ring might be more expensive, it more than earns its higher price. However, those looking for more affordable options would not be blamed for opting for the Arlo camera that’s $100 cheaper.
The image featured at the top of this post is ©G-Stock Studio/Shutterstock.com.